Pre-release: this release has not been published. Identifiers are permanent; descriptions may still change.
evidence from https://exa.ai/library/legal/opinion/5pc0k521hcc2mxb2cdgwnwjk
evidence from https://exa.ai/library/legal/opinion/5pc0k521hcc2mxb2cdgwnwjk is an evidence.
https://ontology.bommaritollc.com/id/01a0e4d8-71ee-746c-a994-6eb5fc29ecf3
Facts
| dcterms:source | |
| prov:wasGeneratedBy | |
| rdfs:comment | Deacon v. Pandora Media, Inc., Michigan Supreme Court, 2015: The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether Deacon has stated a claim against Pandora for violation of the Michigan Video Rental Privacy Act, MCL 445.1711 et seq., by adequately alleging that Pandora is in the business of “renting” or “lending” sound recordings, and that he is a “customer” of Pandora, because he “rents” or “borrows” sound recordings from Pandora. |